Over two days in June, over 200 researchers and migrant rights activists from around the world gathered in Malm\u00f6 for the International Conference on Migration, Irregularisation and Activism. In 30 workshops and plenary lectures we shared knowledge, experiences, and analyses accumulated from a variety of projects on global migration. Many presentations addressed the current migration political situation in Europe and in Sweden through analyses of border politics and of people\u2019s experiences of border control, both en route and in its routine expressions, in everyday life and in places of arrival. Other presentations offered historical reflections on how border control has changed over time, and how border control is linked to racism, social differentiation and economic inequality within Europe.<\/p>\n
Although we \u2013the conference participants\u2013 represent a variety of academic and political perspectives, we are all troubled by the current political development on migration issues and share a sense of distress about the thousands of migrants who have died while trying to make the journey across and within European borders.<\/p>\n
In Sweden, since last autumn, the government has developed legislation that seeks to deter asylum seekers and irregular migrants. Among the changes that have already been implemented passport checks have effectively closed the borders for asylum seekers trying to reach Sweden. Another new policy that has just been implemented is the withdrawal of accommodation for asylum applicants who have been rejected. On June 21 the parliament will vote on further proposals which entail a series of harsh measures that will have even more wide-ranging and detrimental consequences for asylum seekers\u2019 rights and lives.<\/p>\n
We are taking this opportunity to protest against the restrictive legislations that have already been implemented in Sweden and against the additional proposals that the parliament will soon be voting upon.<\/p>\n
Our conviction is informed by the depth and breadth of our collective experience as researchers and activists. Many of the research conclusions shared at this conference show the importance of permanence and stability for enabling migrants to demand labour rights, to build or rebuild families, and to move towards creating a secure and safe life. But the legislation proposed by the Swedish government creates the opposite conditions: it proposes temporary residence permits instead of permanent ones. It demands educational attainment of young refugees that is not required of Swedish nationals and other more privileged migrants. It proposes labour market performance as a condition for permanent permits and for the right of family reunification. And it tacitly supports an anti-immigrant discourse that creates a climate of fear and insecurity for migrants and their families.<\/p>\n
Many protests and campaigns to reject these proposals are currently underway \u2013 and with this statement we join them. As scholars we see it as our obligation to voice clearly that the proposed legislation, as well as the changes that have already been implemented, are in opposition to what we see as established knowledge about the conditions of migration and migration rights.<\/p>\n
Therefore, we demand:<\/p>\n
That the European Union facilitates safe passage for refugees to Europe, so they do not have to undertake dangerous and traumatic journeys;<\/p>\n
That the European Union and member state governments facilitate their citizens learning about their responsibilities to refugees;<\/p>\n
In Sweden we demand that that people on their way to or through Europe are not stopped from reaching Sweden by transporter\u2019s liability and passport checks;<\/p>\n
That families have the right to reunite without risking their lives and without being forced into precarious situations in the labour market;<\/p>\n
That people be offered the opportunity to gain security and continuity through permanent residence permits.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The conference participants agreed unanimously during a plenary session to stand behind this statement<\/em><\/p>\n Bridget Anderson (Oxford University, Storbritannien) Pouran Djampour (Malm\u00f6 H\u00f6gskola)
\nLiz Fekete (Institute of Race Relations, Storbritannien)
\nMercedes Jim\u00e9nez\u00a0(University of Algarve; Portugal)<\/p>\n
\nJacob Lind (Malm\u00f6 H\u00f6gskola)
\nVanna Nordling (Lunds Universitet)
\nMaja Sager (Lunds Universitet)
\nEmma S\u00f6derman (Lunds Universitet)
\nIoanna Tsoni (Malm\u00f6 H\u00f6gskola)
\nAnders Neergaard (Link\u00f6ping Universitet)
\nAnna Lundberg (Malm\u00f6 Universitet)
\nSanna Vestin (FARR)
\nCarin Bj\u00f6rngren Cuadra (Lunds universitet)<\/p>\n